Posts Tagged "Psychology"
Thanks for coming back! I appreciate your viewing.

genetics and psychologyGenetic engineering in sports is becoming a more popular issues in the fitness/performance world.  One area that is not being discussed with this issue is the psychological concerns for the athlete and even the fan.  Knowing that individuals may be genetic enhanced would put a different perspective on cheating.  How would we now define cheating?  Would cheating have to be some more than physical enhancement?  Steroid use is considered cheating by many, so the assumption would be that genetic engineering would be too.

But as a fan would you want to know who was genetically enhanced?  Would a list come out every few years?  There are so many questions that cannot be answered easily but I have one that may be worth discussing.

What would genetic engineering do to an athlete’s psyche?

Being prepared to play/compete at a higher level is not necessarily due to being physically bigger or stronger.  Its about understanding and being able to do the work and be successful.  Being stronger doesn’t guarantee that your game performance improves, often there is an adjustment period to managing the “new” strength and abilities.  Also when an individual is working towards reaching professional levels confidence is a big component.

So let’s consider this scenario, there is an elite college school football prospect.  Everyone projects that with his talent if he gets stronger and faster he will not only be a high draft pick but also a top player.  So he goes through some genetic therapy and gains a ton of muscle and strength.  Now, as this “perfect” athlete enters the NFL he is not so great anymore.  Smarter players keep out performing him.  Where does his confidence go?  Now what does he do?

Or how about this scenario.  A fringe player uses genetic therapy to increase his strength and size.  Due to this he makes himself more competitive for a spot on a team despite his actual ability not increasing.  What message does it send to his teammates about being on the fringe?

The ripple effect is sometimes truly unknown until the situation arises but one thing is for sure, when this does happen it will change how sports are played and watched. (note: as you can read, I said when not if. I do believe this is in our sport future.)

Two sites giving both sides of this issue from a bio/medical viewpoint:

Links to Genetic Engineering and Its Dangers

Current News In Genetic Engineering

On August 14th David Ortiz decided he had enough. Before the game against Texas David Ortiz sat down with the team psychologist and got some things off his mind.  After this meeting he unloaded on the media about his fustrations on how quickly they turned on him.  All of this, along with the reports that he has be down due to Manny Ramirez being traded, has clearly being weighing on him.

Since this change he has hit 13-38 (.342) with 4 doubles and 7 homeruns. This is a phenomonal example of how much psychological issues can affect physical performance.  Maybe more people will start to look at psychology a little more seriously in the sport’s world, unlike this example.

Who was doing all of the exercise?

Who was doing all of the exercise?

The BBC posted a story on a study on how much exercise younger children were getting.  The problem was that many of the kids who participated actually tricked the researchers.  They fooled them by attaching their pedometers to their pet dogs, which greatly inflated their scores.  This was found out when obese children were not losing any weight despite the high numbers of steps recorded on their pedometers.

This is a great example of why it can be so difficult to do research.  Performance related research, outside of a laboratory setting, involves careful checks and balances.  In this case, the researcher’s attempted to account for the use of dogs but despite this it still changes the outcome of the data.

As a reader of various research studies, this situation exemplifies the importance of not only analyzing the results of a study but also the methodology.  Understanding how the research was done provides many insights to what the results are saying before you read the discussion.  Take care with what you are reading and if you are doing research be extra careful with how you are doing it.

signature

This interview with Tiger Woods, on ESPN, provides an excellent look into the issues that professional athletes deal with.  While he is in a class by himself he discusses issues that can affect athletes, professional and amateur alike, and even people who have jobs that require a lot of time.  So often we view athletes as people who only have to deal performance concerns but as you know life is much more complicated than that.

Key points to watch for:

He discusses that his practice schedule has changed due to having a child.  While he cannot practice as much, it has forced him to be more deliberate and focused during his practice.  It’s a good reminder that practice is not simply about how much time you take but more about how you practice.  Being creative in your practice can be very beneficial.

He addresses the social responsibility of athletes.  His words focus on how being political is not the only way to be socially proactive.  He understands he is potentially in a position of “power ” so instead he focuses on areas he can control.

He also discusses what he struggled with at the US Open.  His ability to self-analyze is a skill that athletes and others need to always work on.  Self-analysis is not about being critical.  It is about being able to recognize a problem and then be able to work on the issue in a productive way.

Enjoy the video!

signature

For more information about mental performance, as well as overall athletic performance enhancement, check out our websites. The links are on the right of the homepage.

I recently attended and spoke at the Conference for Counseling Athletes and while there were some interesting topics I realized professional conferences provide an important service to professionals in the field besides education and information.  Professional conferences allow you to gauge where you are in your career and validate (or possibly reject) the work you are doing.  In many professions even if you work with a group or larger department you become secluded.  You become secluded in your thinking, your process, and your expectations.  Without having contact with other professionals it is hard to expand your thinking or even be truly creative in your field.  Working in groups and with other talents helps progress the work you’re doing.  (See Malcolm Gladwell’s article on Group Think).

From my own experience I know how easy it is to get into a rhythm and not change the approach to the work your doing.  After learning how to do something and having it work (read: not go wrong) make a change is difficult because it becomes a risk and often we do not even recognize that a change is needed.  (This is something I addressed during my talk at the conference.  I’ve learned even though no one is complain it does not mean everything is working.)   Again, by attending a professional conference there are opportunities to see where you can make changes and get ideas on how to improve the work you are doing.

Also when you have the opportunity to present or lecture at a conference I think most people should.  It provided a unique experience for me.  While I have talked at other conference this was the first where the attendees were peers within my field.  Talking to this audience provided some excellent challenges for me.  First, I had to make sure I was clear with what I was talking about because if I wasn’t or made errors the attendees would know.  I want to sound professional.  For example, if I am talking about sport psychology skills to a group of tennis coaches the chances that any of them notice if I make a mistake is small.  Often it is from someone who has done some work in sport psychology or heard similar talks before.  But when I make a mistake in front of a room full of other professionals just about all of them may notice this and challenge me on it.  Second, from a creative/innovative standpoint I wanted to make sure that my presentation was interesting and worthwhile.  I know when I go to a conference I want to learn about new/different approaches, theories, and practices not just repackaged stuff I learned while in school.   Lastly, to get feedback in this type of setting is great because it is coming from people who know your profession.

While sometimes they are tedious or boring, by choosing the right professional conference and attending with proper expectations a lot can be gained.   So I encourage you to find a conference that fits and try to expand your professional horizons.

signature

A recent article in the NY Times discussed the rise of anxiety cases in baseball.  As you read through the article my thoughts are italicized in orange. Original Article Here

The Dontrelle of Old

The Dontrelle of Old

Putting the Pressure on a Diagnosis

It used to be that people would question whether a player could handle the big stage in cities like New York and Boston. Now, though, there appears to be plenty of pressure off Broadway as well.

An excellent point here due to technology and media.  No matter where I am in the country I can follow my favorite team and players.  There is so much scrutinizing of these players through channels like ESPN, blogs (I try to always be constructive but I am still critical), and social media sites that have now added pressure to perform.  Somebody is ALWAYS watching.

This season, Dontrelle Willis of Detroit and Khalil Greene of St. Louis have been on the disabled list with social anxiety disorder. Cincinnati’s Joey Votto went on the D.L. last week for a “stress-related issue.” And of course, Zack Greinke of Kansas City, currently having a breakthrough season, battled social anxiety disorder and depression early in his career.

Social anxiety disorder may be a misdiagnosis.  It sounds more like generalized anxiety disorder.  Semantics, but none-the-less important from a professional viewpoint.  Dontrelle Willis completely imploded last year and has worked his way back to the majors.  Of course he’s feeling more pressure.  He went from one of the best pitchers to almost being out of baseball to being back.  That’s scary, frustrating, and anxiety inducing for anyone.  Let’s not forget that athletes are people too.  Think about your own job and if you were in a similar position, how would you psychologically respond?

While few doubt the pressure of playing at the major league level, at least one mental-health professional raised an eyebrow at the growing number of social anxiety disorder diagnoses.

“I’m very suspicious of that diagnosis,” said Dr. Allan Lans, a psychiatrist who practices in New York and has worked with athletes throughout his career, most notably as a member of the Mets’ staff. “It’s not like catching the chickenpox; there has to be a history.”

Wrong. You can develop it at any age. While Dr. Lans is correct about not catching it like chickenpox (bad analogy by the way), it can develop through changes in one’s life.  The players might be dealing with off-field things we don’t know about. They could be having marriage issues, family fights, issues with team management, etc.  It’s not simply about baseball.  Again, THEY ARE PEOPLE TOO!

Lans said social anxiety was a real ailment but was being overdiagnosed. Once a player reaches the majors, Lans said, the issue should not be a surprise.

Why not?

“What happens in baseball is that players, day after day, are performing in front of varying size crowds,” he said. “At a certain point, they blank out all that stuff and concentrate on their jobs. Repeated exposure is one of the most successful treatments. So for a guy who has been in the public eye to suddenly have social anxiety disorder is a little off the wall, in my book.

See the last 3 comments above.

“In baseball, you don’t hit most of the time and you make errors some of the time. You learn to deal with it. A person with social anxiety disorder would never have played to begin with.”

That’s inaccurate again.

A spokesman for the Tigers said the team could not discuss details of Willis’s case because of privacy laws. The Cardinals also declined to comment on Greene. But Brian Britten, the Tigers’ spokesman, said that Major League Baseball has its own doctors and will not allow someone to be put on the disabled list without cause.

Three recent cases involved players who were struggling, possibly for the first time in their careers. Greinke had had only one dominant season in the minors when he was rushed to the majors at 20. Willis, 27, has been unable to duplicate 2005, when he was one of baseball’s most dominant pitchers. Greene, 29, a former first-round draft pick, is in his second season with an average in the low .200s.

Players could be “finding an excuse for why your performance isn’t what it was before,” Lans said. “Look, there are certain instances where it is a real issue, and you’d probably find it’s been there all along — going back to childhood, 7 or 8 years old. So I don’t want to say it doesn’t exist. But you can’t suddenly develop it because you’re not having a good year.’’

Why is it an excuse?  There is so much stigma still attached to mental health you would think a psychiatrist would say “yeah mental health is a real issue, athletes are susceptible too”. Need more examples of athletes dealing with mental illness read this. There is no study that says anxiety issues have to develop as a child.  If that is the truth then why can’t some players play in bigger markets? (I’m looking at you Edgar Renteria.)  I’ll tell you why, added stress which leads to more anxiety!  It’s disappointing for me to be part of the psychology field and still deal with peers who fall into this old school way of thinking.  It’s time to start looking at situations for what they are and accept athletes as people not some strange mutant that is immune to life.

For more information about mental performance as well as overall athletic performance enhancement check out our websites. The links are on the right of the page.